Is Aurora or Bakersfield more affordable?
Aurora has a median rent of $1,650/month, while Bakersfield is $1,150/month. Bakersfield is more affordable for renters.
City comparison
Aurora, CO vs Bakersfield, CA
Side-by-side comparison of cost of living, taxes, climate, and quality of life between Aurora and Bakersfield.
3
Aurora wins
of 5 metrics
tracked
2
Bakersfield wins
CO
Aurora
vs
CA
Bakersfield
Overview
388,568
Population
403,455
$60,817✓
Median Income
-9.5%$55,026
Cost of Living
$1,650
Median Rent / mo
-30.3%$1,150✓
$440,000
Median Home Price
-29.5%$310,000✓
33%
Rent-to-Income %
25%
Taxes
4.40%✓
State Income Tax
9.30%
8.00%
Local Tax Rate
8.25%
Climate & Weather
65°F
Avg High Temp
81°F
38°F
Avg Low Temp
52°F
300 days✓
Sunny Days / Year
276 days
15"
Annual Rainfall
7"
Who should choose
Aurora, CO
Aurora is a city in Colorado with a population of 388,568.
Read full Aurora guide →Who should choose
Bakersfield, CA
Bakersfield is a city in California with a population of 403,455.
Read full Bakersfield guide →Aurora vs Bakersfield — Common Questions
Which city has lower taxes — Aurora or Bakersfield?
Colorado has a 4.40% state income tax. California has a 9.30% state income tax. Aurora wins on state income tax.
What is the weather difference between Aurora and Bakersfield?
Aurora gets 300 sunny days/year. Bakersfield gets 276 sunny days/year. Avg high in Aurora: 65°F. Avg high in Bakersfield: 81°F
Which city is better for families — Aurora or Bakersfield?
Aurora. Bakersfield. The right choice depends on your priorities — income, affordability, taxes, and climate all play a role.
More city comparisons
Data sourced from U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and NOAA. Green values indicate a better outcome for that metric.