Is Aurora or San Francisco more affordable?
Aurora has a median rent of $1,650/month, while San Francisco is $2,130/month. Aurora is more affordable for renters.
City comparison
Aurora, CO vs San Francisco, CA
Side-by-side comparison of cost of living, taxes, climate, and quality of life between Aurora and San Francisco.
4
Aurora wins
of 5 metrics
tracked
1
San Francisco wins
CO
Aurora
vs
CA
San Francisco
Overview
388,568
Population
865,933
$60,817
Median Income
+107.5%$126,187✓
Cost of Living
$1,650✓
Median Rent / mo
+29.1%$2,130
$440,000✓
Median Home Price
+171.5%$1,194,500
33%
Rent-to-Income %
20%
Taxes
4.40%✓
State Income Tax
13.30%
8.00%
Local Tax Rate
0.00%
Climate & Weather
65°F
Avg High Temp
55.62°F
38°F
Avg Low Temp
48.76°F
300 days✓
Sunny Days / Year
N/A
15"
Annual Rainfall
N/A
Who should choose
Aurora, CO
Aurora is a city in Colorado with a population of 388,568.
Read full Aurora guide →Who should choose
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco is a city in California with a population of 865,933.
Read full San Francisco guide →Aurora vs San Francisco — Common Questions
Which city has lower taxes — Aurora or San Francisco?
Colorado has a 4.40% state income tax. California has a 13.30% state income tax. Aurora wins on state income tax.
What is the weather difference between Aurora and San Francisco?
Aurora gets 300 sunny days/year. Avg high in Aurora: 65°F. Avg high in San Francisco: 55.62°F
Which city is better for families — Aurora or San Francisco?
Aurora. San Francisco. The right choice depends on your priorities — income, affordability, taxes, and climate all play a role.
More city comparisons
Data sourced from U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and NOAA. Green values indicate a better outcome for that metric.