Is Austin or Bakersfield more affordable?
Austin has a median rent of $1,415/month, while Bakersfield is $1,150/month. Bakersfield is more affordable for renters.
City comparison
Side-by-side comparison of cost of living, taxes, climate, and quality of life between Austin and Bakersfield.
2
Austin wins
of 5 metrics
tracked
3
Bakersfield wins
TX
Austin
CA
Bakersfield
Overview
Population
Median Income
-30.3%Cost of Living
Median Rent / mo
-18.7%Median Home Price
-18.7%Rent-to-Income %
Taxes
State Income Tax
Local Tax Rate
Climate & Weather
Avg High Temp
Avg Low Temp
Sunny Days / Year
Annual Rainfall
Who should choose
Austin is a city in Texas with a population of 944,658.
Read full Austin guide →Who should choose
Bakersfield is a city in California with a population of 403,455.
Read full Bakersfield guide →Austin has a median rent of $1,415/month, while Bakersfield is $1,150/month. Bakersfield is more affordable for renters.
Texas has no state income tax. California has a 9.30% state income tax. Austin wins on state income tax.
Bakersfield gets 276 sunny days/year. Avg high in Austin: 71.28°F. Avg high in Bakersfield: 81°F
Austin. Bakersfield. The right choice depends on your priorities — income, affordability, taxes, and climate all play a role.
Data sourced from U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and NOAA. Green values indicate a better outcome for that metric.