Is Bakersfield or Kansas City more affordable?
Bakersfield has a median rent of $1,150/month, while Kansas City is $1,100/month. Kansas City is more affordable for renters.
City comparison
Side-by-side comparison of cost of living, taxes, climate, and quality of life between Bakersfield and Kansas City.
1
Bakersfield wins
of 5 metrics
tracked
4
Kansas City wins
CA
Bakersfield
MO
Kansas City
Overview
Population
Median Income
+4.6%Cost of Living
Median Rent / mo
-4.3%Median Home Price
-25.8%Rent-to-Income %
Taxes
State Income Tax
Local Tax Rate
Climate & Weather
Avg High Temp
Avg Low Temp
Sunny Days / Year
Annual Rainfall
Who should choose
Bakersfield is a city in California with a population of 403,455.
Read full Bakersfield guide →Who should choose
Kansas City is a city in Missouri with a population of 508,090.
Read full Kansas City guide →Bakersfield has a median rent of $1,150/month, while Kansas City is $1,100/month. Kansas City is more affordable for renters.
California has a 9.30% state income tax. Missouri has a 4.70% state income tax. Kansas City wins on state income tax.
Bakersfield gets 276 sunny days/year. Kansas City gets 214 sunny days/year. Avg high in Bakersfield: 81°F. Avg high in Kansas City: 65°F
Bakersfield. Kansas City. The right choice depends on your priorities — income, affordability, taxes, and climate all play a role.
Data sourced from U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and NOAA. Green values indicate a better outcome for that metric.