Is Bakersfield or Tulsa more affordable?
Bakersfield has a median rent of $1,150/month, while Tulsa is $950/month. Tulsa is more affordable for renters.
City comparison
Side-by-side comparison of cost of living, taxes, climate, and quality of life between Bakersfield and Tulsa.
2
Bakersfield wins
of 5 metrics
tracked
3
Tulsa wins
CA
Bakersfield
OK
Tulsa
Overview
Population
Median Income
-12.8%Cost of Living
Median Rent / mo
-17.4%Median Home Price
-38.7%Rent-to-Income %
Taxes
State Income Tax
Local Tax Rate
Climate & Weather
Avg High Temp
Avg Low Temp
Sunny Days / Year
Annual Rainfall
Who should choose
Bakersfield is a city in California with a population of 403,455.
Read full Bakersfield guide →Who should choose
Tulsa is a city in Oklahoma with a population of 413,066.
Read full Tulsa guide →Bakersfield has a median rent of $1,150/month, while Tulsa is $950/month. Tulsa is more affordable for renters.
California has a 9.30% state income tax. Oklahoma has a 4.75% state income tax. Tulsa wins on state income tax.
Bakersfield gets 276 sunny days/year. Tulsa gets 216 sunny days/year. Avg high in Bakersfield: 81°F. Avg high in Tulsa: 70°F
Bakersfield. Tulsa. The right choice depends on your priorities — income, affordability, taxes, and climate all play a role.
Data sourced from U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and NOAA. Green values indicate a better outcome for that metric.