Is Chicago or Tulsa more affordable?
Chicago has a median rent of $1,209/month, while Tulsa is $950/month. Tulsa is more affordable for renters.
City comparison
Side-by-side comparison of cost of living, taxes, climate, and quality of life between Chicago and Tulsa.
1
Chicago wins
of 5 metrics
tracked
4
Tulsa wins
IL
Chicago
OK
Tulsa
Overview
Population
Median Income
-27.0%Cost of Living
Median Rent / mo
-21.4%Median Home Price
-31.6%Rent-to-Income %
Taxes
State Income Tax
Local Tax Rate
Climate & Weather
Avg High Temp
Avg Low Temp
Sunny Days / Year
Annual Rainfall
Who should choose
Chicago is a city in Illinois with a population of 2,742,119.
Read full Chicago guide →Who should choose
Tulsa is a city in Oklahoma with a population of 413,066.
Read full Tulsa guide →Chicago has a median rent of $1,209/month, while Tulsa is $950/month. Tulsa is more affordable for renters.
Illinois has a 4.95% state income tax. Oklahoma has a 4.75% state income tax. Tulsa wins on state income tax.
Tulsa gets 216 sunny days/year. Avg high in Chicago: 54.12°F. Avg high in Tulsa: 70°F
Chicago. Tulsa. The right choice depends on your priorities — income, affordability, taxes, and climate all play a role.
Data sourced from U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and NOAA. Green values indicate a better outcome for that metric.