Is Los Angeles or San Francisco more affordable?
Los Angeles has a median rent of $1,852/month, while San Francisco is $2,130/month. Los Angeles is more affordable for renters.
City comparison
Side-by-side comparison of cost of living, taxes, climate, and quality of life between Los Angeles and San Francisco.
4
Los Angeles wins
of 5 metrics
tracked
1
San Francisco wins
CA
Los Angeles
CA
San Francisco
Overview
Population
Median Income
+82.5%Cost of Living
Median Rent / mo
+15.0%Median Home Price
+59.3%Rent-to-Income %
Taxes
State Income Tax
Local Tax Rate
Climate & Weather
Avg High Temp
Avg Low Temp
Sunny Days / Year
Annual Rainfall
Who should choose
Los Angeles is a city in California with a population of 3,898,747.
Read full Los Angeles guide →Who should choose
San Francisco is a city in California with a population of 865,933.
Read full San Francisco guide →Los Angeles has a median rent of $1,852/month, while San Francisco is $2,130/month. Los Angeles is more affordable for renters.
California has a 9.30% state income tax. California has a 13.30% state income tax. Los Angeles wins on state income tax.
Los Angeles gets 284 sunny days/year. Avg high in Los Angeles: 75°F. Avg high in San Francisco: 55.62°F
Los Angeles. San Francisco. The right choice depends on your priorities — income, affordability, taxes, and climate all play a role.
Data sourced from U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and NOAA. Green values indicate a better outcome for that metric.