Is San Francisco or St. Louis more affordable?
San Francisco has a median rent of $2,130/month, while St. Louis is $950/month. St. Louis is more affordable for renters.
City comparison
Side-by-side comparison of cost of living, taxes, climate, and quality of life between San Francisco and St. Louis.
1
San Francisco wins
of 5 metrics
tracked
4
St. Louis wins
CA
San Francisco
MO
St. Louis
Overview
Population
Median Income
-66.7%Cost of Living
Median Rent / mo
-55.4%Median Home Price
-86.2%Rent-to-Income %
Taxes
State Income Tax
Local Tax Rate
Climate & Weather
Avg High Temp
Avg Low Temp
Sunny Days / Year
Annual Rainfall
Who should choose
San Francisco is a city in California with a population of 865,933.
Read full San Francisco guide →Who should choose
St. Louis is a city in Missouri with a population of 293,310.
Read full St. Louis guide →San Francisco has a median rent of $2,130/month, while St. Louis is $950/month. St. Louis is more affordable for renters.
California has a 13.30% state income tax. Missouri has a 4.70% state income tax. St. Louis wins on state income tax.
St. Louis gets 205 sunny days/year. Avg high in San Francisco: 55.62°F. Avg high in St. Louis: 64°F
San Francisco. St. Louis. The right choice depends on your priorities — income, affordability, taxes, and climate all play a role.
Data sourced from U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and NOAA. Green values indicate a better outcome for that metric.