Is San Francisco or Tucson more affordable?
San Francisco has a median rent of $2,130/month, while Tucson is $1,000/month. Tucson is more affordable for renters.
City comparison
Side-by-side comparison of cost of living, taxes, climate, and quality of life between San Francisco and Tucson.
1
San Francisco wins
of 5 metrics
tracked
4
Tucson wins
CA
San Francisco
AZ
Tucson
Overview
Population
Median Income
-66.2%Cost of Living
Median Rent / mo
-53.1%Median Home Price
-79.1%Rent-to-Income %
Taxes
State Income Tax
Local Tax Rate
Climate & Weather
Avg High Temp
Avg Low Temp
Sunny Days / Year
Annual Rainfall
Who should choose
San Francisco is a city in California with a population of 865,933.
Read full San Francisco guide →Who should choose
Tucson is a city in Arizona with a population of 546,574.
Read full Tucson guide →San Francisco has a median rent of $2,130/month, while Tucson is $1,000/month. Tucson is more affordable for renters.
California has a 13.30% state income tax. Arizona has a 2.50% state income tax. Tucson wins on state income tax.
Tucson gets 286 sunny days/year. Avg high in San Francisco: 55.62°F. Avg high in Tucson: 80°F
San Francisco. Tucson. The right choice depends on your priorities — income, affordability, taxes, and climate all play a role.
Data sourced from U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and NOAA. Green values indicate a better outcome for that metric.