Is San Francisco or Tulsa more affordable?
San Francisco has a median rent of $2,130/month, while Tulsa is $950/month. Tulsa is more affordable for renters.
City comparison
San Francisco, CA vs Tulsa, OK
Side-by-side comparison of cost of living, taxes, climate, and quality of life between San Francisco and Tulsa.
1
San Francisco wins
of 5 metrics
tracked
4
Tulsa wins
CA
San Francisco
vs
OK
Tulsa
Overview
865,933
Population
413,066
$126,187✓
Median Income
-62.0%$48,000
Cost of Living
$2,130
Median Rent / mo
-55.4%$950✓
$1,194,500
Median Home Price
-84.1%$190,000✓
20%
Rent-to-Income %
24%
Taxes
13.30%
State Income Tax
4.75%✓
0.00%
Local Tax Rate
8.52%
Climate & Weather
55.62°F
Avg High Temp
70°F
48.76°F
Avg Low Temp
49°F
N/A
Sunny Days / Year
216 days✓
N/A
Annual Rainfall
42"
Who should choose
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco is a city in California with a population of 865,933.
Read full San Francisco guide →Who should choose
Tulsa, OK
Tulsa is a city in Oklahoma with a population of 413,066.
Read full Tulsa guide →San Francisco vs Tulsa — Common Questions
Which city has lower taxes — San Francisco or Tulsa?
California has a 13.30% state income tax. Oklahoma has a 4.75% state income tax. Tulsa wins on state income tax.
What is the weather difference between San Francisco and Tulsa?
Tulsa gets 216 sunny days/year. Avg high in San Francisco: 55.62°F. Avg high in Tulsa: 70°F
Which city is better for families — San Francisco or Tulsa?
San Francisco. Tulsa. The right choice depends on your priorities — income, affordability, taxes, and climate all play a role.
More city comparisons
Data sourced from U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and NOAA. Green values indicate a better outcome for that metric.